Partnership for Educational Justice

  • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • Our History
    • FAQ
    • Contact Us
  • Teacher Quality Lawsuits
    • New York Lawsuit (Wright v. New York)
    • Minnesota Lawsuit (Forslund v. Minnesota)
    • New Jersey Lawsuit (HG v. Harrington)
    • Permanent Employment
    • Other Initiatives
  • Legal Filings
    • Wright v. New York Legal Filings
    • Forslund v. Minnesota Legal Filings
    • HG v. Harrington Legal Filings
    • DACA Amicus Brief Filings by PEJ
    • Partnerships
  • Media
    • Press Releases
    • Blog
  • Action
    • Donate
    • Share your Story
    • Sign up for our Email List
    • Follow Us on Social Media
    • Read the Research on Teacher Quality

Bradford: Randi Weingarten’s Ugly Endorsement and the War Against Poor Students

April 28, 2016

Derrell Bradford | The 74

“When you work to change public education, people who don’t want change will try to reduce what you’re doing to a cliché. Then they’ll attack the cliché.

Here’s an example. If you publicly argue that merit should play a role in a teacher’s career — in compensation, job security, or advancement — your likely destination is a box labeled “Anti-Teacher.” Before long, you’ll also be cited in an article about the ‘war on teachers.’

Being in the box implies several things: You don’t understand schools or how hard teachers work and you think you can fire your way to improvement. The box implies the inverse as well: improving teaching is not necessary and an effort at reform, anywhere, is an attack on teachers everywhere.”

Read More

Filed Under: In the News

12th-graders’ Federal Test Scores Dip in Math and Reading While More Manage to Graduate

April 27, 2016

Matt Barnum | The 74

“The nation’s 12th-grade students did slightly worse on national math and reading tests in 2015 than high school seniors did in 2013, according to National Assessment of Educational Progress results released today, even as high school graduation rates got better.

The overall score decreases were quite small — roughly two points in math and a single point in reading — but continued a trend of lackluster 12th-grade performance on the national test. The change in the 2015 results registered as statistically different in math compared to two years ago, but not in reading.”

Read More

Filed Under: In the News

Test Scores Show a Decline in Math Among High School Seniors

April 27, 2016

Kate Zernike | The New York Times

“The average performance of the nation’s high school seniors dropped in math from 2013 to 2015, but held steady in reading, according to results of a biennial test released Wednesday.

The results, from the National Assessment of Educational Progress, also showed a drop in the percentage of students in private and public schools who are considered prepared for college-level work in reading and math. In 2013, the last time the test was given, 39 percent of students were estimated to be ready in math and 38 percent in reading; in 2015, 37 percent were judged prepared in each subject.”

Read More

Filed Under: In the News

The Classroom in the Courtroom

April 22, 2016

Andrew J. Rotherham | US News & World Report

“I’ll see you in court!

Is this the new default position for education’s flashpoints?

Earlier this month a California appeals court overturned a high-profile lower court decision invalidating several state laws about teacher tenure rights. The laws might be damaging, the court said in Vergara v. California, but that doesn’t make them unconstitutional. That case now heads to the California Supreme Court.

Also this month a lawsuit aimed at the same kind of tenure laws was filed in Minnesota. Similar litigation is ongoing in New York. Students in Massachusetts are suing over that state’s charter school cap, saying it denies them access to good schools.”

Read More

Filed Under: In the News

Meet Forslund v. MN Lead Plaintiff Tiffini Flynn Forslund

April 21, 2016

_Tiffini

Tiffini Flynn Forslund, a mother of three from Minneapolis, watched year after year as her children went through the public school system – yearning for a sense of community that she felt in her schools as a child. When her middle child entered 5th grade, Tiffini saw her education improve because of the powerful impact of one great teacher. This teacher was incredibly engaging: he challenged her daughter to succeed, and collaborated with parents like Tiffini to support students inside and outside of the classroom.

Tiffini was stunned to find out that this teacher was laid off due to “last-in, first-out” (LIFO) dismissal policies, which prioritize seniority over teacher quality when a school district conducts budgetary layoffs. To think that her youngest daughter would not have the chance to learn from this terrific teacher drove her to write letters to the local newspapers, the school board, and government officials. She was told, “this is just how it works.”

Tiffini believes that every child in Minnesota deserves to have great teachers. Tiffini’s youngest daughter was deprived of an excellent teacher because of LIFO policies. Her hope is that this lawsuit will allow for change to Minnesota’s LIFO laws and other teacher employment laws so that schools may prioritize effective teaching when making employment decisions.

Filed Under: Blog

Meet Forslund v. MN Plaintiff Bonnie Dominguez

April 21, 2016

_Bonnie

Bonnie Dominguez is a mother of three from Duluth. Her daughter thrived in a specialized learning program until her 5th grade year, when she began to struggle academically and socially. Conversations with her daughter’s teachers did not lead to productive solutions and, as a result, Bonnie’s daughter lost significant ground.

When her daughter entered 6th grade, Bonnie, with the help of her daughter’s 6th grade teacher, discovered that her daughter’s specialized education program was not properly implemented during her 5th grade year, prompting the struggles she experienced. By taking an active interest, her 6th grade teacher helped Bonnie’s daughter get back on track.

When Bonnie learned that her daughter’s specialized education program wasn’t implemented in 5th grade, she initially felt helpless. But when she learned that other families experienced similar problems, and that there was a community of parents in search of a solution, she realized she couldn’t keep quiet – that she needed to be the voice for her child and others to make sure no child loses a year of their education. She believes all Minnesota children deserve a great teacher, no matter their socioeconomic status or background.

Filed Under: Blog

Meet Forslund v. MN Plaintiff Justina Person

April 21, 2016

_Justina

Justina Person, a mother of two from Little Canada, suffered for years in the Minnesota public school system until a teacher recognized her dyslexia when she was a junior in high school. Justina credits that teacher for having turned her world around – because of one great teacher’s involvement, she was able to go to college.

Now as a mother, Justina finds herself watching her son face the same struggles – waiting for a teacher to come along like the one who inspired her. In 5th grade, Justina’s son was having so much difficultly understanding a teacher’s lectures that he came up with reasons to leave the classroom every day. His teacher allowed this to happen, standing by for months, instead of working with Justina and her son to find a solution.

Justina was shocked to learn that her son was assigned to the same teacher the following school year. When she voiced her concerns, Justina was told that the school wouldn’t and couldn’t make a change. Feeling dejected and powerless, Justina transferred her son to a school in a different district where teachers have made it a priority to keep him engaged and make sure he is learning. Justina’s son now remains in class, excelling in areas where he struggled before. Since beginning at his new school, he has consistently made the honor roll.

Justina Person hopes that her children will have the opportunity to grow up to be whatever they want to be and never feel limited because they didn’t have access to the education they deserved. Her dream is that they will graduate high school and enter college ready and prepared for the journey ahead.

Filed Under: Blog

Meet Forslund v. MN Plaintiff Roxanne Draughn

April 21, 2016

_Roxanne

Roxanne Draughn is a mother of two from St. Paul. After a great pre-K experience, her son entered kindergarten eager to learn. However, after Roxanne lost her job and she and her son moved to a shelter, it became more difficult for him to find reliable transportation to school and to complete his schoolwork on time. Roxanne’s son’s teacher was aware of his difficult circumstances, but was unwilling to make accommodations, subjecting him to increasingly harsh disciplinary measures. The constant reprimands wore down Roxanne’s son, made him reluctant to go to school, and even gave him nightmares. When Roxanne asked whether changes could be made, she was told that her son’s teacher was protected by Minnesota’s tenure laws. This was the first time Roxanne heard about such protections.

Roxanne has since moved her child to a new school, but still worries that her son will be placed with another teacher that discourages his love for learning. She hopes that when her youngest son, who is only 17-months old, is ready for pre-K, he’ll enter a different kind of school, one filled with teachers who inspire and motivate students to succeed – quality teachers for all kids.

Filed Under: Blog

Why Parents’ Fight for Educational Justice Won’t Be Stopped

April 20, 2016

Ralia Polechronis | The Huffington Post Blog

“Last week another group of parents joined the fight against unconstitutional laws that prevent their kids from getting the education they deserve. They filed a lawsuit in Minnesota, just as parents have done in California and New York, challenging teacher employment statutes that keep ineffective teachers in schools. These Minnesota parents are now part of a growing national movement. Parents across the country are demanding a better—at least, an equal—public education system for children.

But on the same day these parents went to court to enforce their children’s rights, an intermediate California court reversed a trial court victory for parents in that state. And now some are asking whether this latest California ruling will derail the cases of parents in New York and Minnesota.”

Read More

Filed Under: In the News

Weisberg: The Absurd Logic Behind a Vergara Ruling That Tells Parents They Have No Recourse

April 19, 2016

Daniel Weisberg | The 74

“Last week, a California appeals court restored the state’s teacher tenure laws, which had been ruled unconstitutional by a lower court two years ago. But the ruling was hardly a ringing endorsement of California’s approach to tenure.

Here’s what’s not in dispute in the case, Vergara v. California, even after the appeals court’s decision: Thousands of teachers in schools across California — a small percentage but still a huge number — are not up to the job. These grossly ineffective teachers are derailing their students’ academic futures. Poor and minority students are more likely than others to be assigned to one of these teachers. And all of this is happening because of state laws that make it practically impossible for schools to replace the relatively few teachers who shouldn’t be there.”

Read More

Filed Under: In the News

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • …
  • 64
  • Next Page »
  • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • Our History
    • FAQ
    • Contact Us
  • Teacher Quality Lawsuits
    • New York Lawsuit (Wright v. New York)
    • Minnesota Lawsuit (Forslund v. Minnesota)
    • New Jersey Lawsuit (HG v. Harrington)
    • Permanent Employment
    • Other Initiatives
  • Legal Filings
    • Wright v. New York Legal Filings
    • Forslund v. Minnesota Legal Filings
    • HG v. Harrington Legal Filings
    • DACA Amicus Brief Filings by PEJ
    • Partnerships
  • Media
    • Press Releases
    • Blog
  • Action
    • Donate
    • Share your Story
    • Sign up for our Email List
    • Follow Us on Social Media
    • Read the Research on Teacher Quality

Copyright

© 2014 Partnership for Educational Justice

Disclaimer

Partnership for Educational Justice is recognized by the Internal Revenue Service as an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Privacy Policy

Terms & Conditions