De Blasio’s Happily Making it Harder to Fire Rotten Teachers
New York Post
“Fresh cause for city parents to fret: For the second straight year, the share of teachers winning tenure has ticked up.
Some 64 percent got the OK this year, meaning they’ll be nearly impossible to fire as long as they want to keep their jobs.
That’s only slightly higher than last year’s 60 percent rate — but a marked jump from the 53 percent figure the year before, Mike Bloomberg’s last year as mayor.
Bloomberg wanted to be able to oust teachers who can’t teach. That’s a key reason why, on his watch, the tenure-approval rate fell steeply from the days when nine out of 10 teachers got lifetime protection.”
Latasha Gandy: Challenging Laws That Keep Ineffective Teachers in the Classroom
Twin Cities Pioneer Press
“Four Minnesota mothers have recently taken on our state’s education system. They filed suit, challenging the constitutionality of laws that keep ineffective teachers in the classroom and keep effective teachers out.
Like most parents, they value education and want their children to be on track, graduate, and go to college. And like most parents, they advocate for their children’s needs and take action when their concerns are ignored. They did that by filing this lawsuit, and Students for Education Reform Minnesota (SFERMinn) is proud to support their efforts.”
Exclusive: Teacher Tenure Approvals Tick Up, Continuing a de Blasio-era Shift
Chalkbeat NY
“New York City teachers were more likely to earn tenure last school year than at any point in the previous five years, but approval rates remain far lower than they were just a few years ago, when virtually every eligible teacher won the job protection.
Sixty-four percent of the 5,832 eligible teachers were granted tenure during the 2014-15 school year, up from 60 percent the year before, according to data released Thursday to Chalkbeat. Another 34 percent had their decisions deferred, and 2.3 percent were rejected, effectively ending their teaching careers in the district.”
New York City Must Stop Hiding Its Weakest Teachers
Tenicka Boyd | Education Post
“A couple of months ago, the mayor of New York City snuck out a press release about his failure to rid the city of some its poorest performing teachers.
What his administration has done instead is allow some of these teachers, many of whom have been out of the classroom for years collecting full salaries, to seep back into schools and teach our city’s most vulnerable children.
A devastating reality of this city’s broken public school system is the fact that our most vulnerable children too often are taught by the least effective teachers. With 75 percent of New York City’s 1.1 million public school students being children of color, you would think that Mayor Bill de Blasio would ensure high-performing teachers reach the halls of every school.”
Forslund v. Minnesota Educator Voices
It’s not only parents who feel that teacher employment statutes in Minnesota need to change. Educators in the state also believe effectiveness should be a critical part of employment decisions in Minnesota public schools. And a 2013 MinnCAN poll of the state’s non-charter public school teachers showed that more than 80 percent agreed that effectiveness should play a role in receiving tenure, and more than 70 percent agreed that lack of effectiveness should be grounds for losing it.
We believe the challenged statutes are promoting ineffective teachers, punishing good teachers, discouraging new and aspiring teachers, and most importantly, robbing Minnesota’s children of the education they deserve. With layoffs based solely on seniority rather than success in the classroom, good teachers are losing their jobs. Those in the first three years of their career are extremely prone to layoffs – just because of when they were hired – even if they’re outstanding and making a huge difference in the lives of Minnesota kids. And in an era of teacher shortages and a lack of diversity, there’s little to attract the next generation of Minnesota’s teachers with so much job insecurity at the start of their careers.
The common-sense reforms we’re advocating are about rewarding teachers with the greatest success in the classroom – whether that’s a tenured math teacher with 10 years of experience or a new science teacher with two. Such reforms would ensure the most effective teachers remain in the classroom to provide the best possible outcomes for students. A system that rewards effectiveness would attract, retain, and empower teachers motivated to ensure their students are learning and have every opportunity for success.
Average Mathematics Score Lower and Reading Score Unchanged
The Nation’s Report Card
In comparison to 2013, the national average mathematics score in 2015 for twelfth-grade students was lower and the average reading score was not significantly different.
In comparison to the first year of the current trendline, 2005, the average mathematics score in 2015 did not significantly differ. In comparison to the initial reading assessment year, 1992, the 2015 average reading score was lower.
Levy-Pounds Joins Teacher Tenure Fight
Anthony Lonetree | StarTribune
“Nekima Levy-Pounds, who as president of the Minneapolis NAACP has been active in several high-profile causes, has joined the legal team challenging the state’s teacher tenure laws.
She will serve as co-counsel representing four mothers in a lawsuit that claims the laws protect teachers who are ineffective and in turn deprive children of a high-quality education.
In a statement, Levy-Pounds said ‘parents are the best advocates to stand up against a public education system that is failing Minnesota children, especially our children of color.'”
PRESS RELEASE: NEKIMA LEVY-POUNDS JOINS FORSLUND V. MINNESOTA AS CO-COUNSEL TO PLAINTIFF PARENTS CHALLENGING STATE STATUTES THAT ALLOW INEFFECTIVE TEACHERS TO REMAIN IN SCHOOLS
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Levy-Pounds to continue her work as an advocate for Minnesota families by fighting to give every child the opportunity to learn from a great teacher
Click here for a full bio of Nekima Levy-Pounds
Minneapolis, MN – Today, Nekima Levy-Pounds, civil rights attorney and social justice advocate, announced she is joining Forslund v. Minnesota as co-counsel representing the four plaintiff parents – Tiffini Flynn Forslund of Minneapolis, Justina Person of Eagan, Bonnie Dominguez of Duluth, and Roxanne Draughn of St. Paul – fighting to level the playing field for all children in Minnesota public schools. The plaintiffs’ legal team also includes attorneys from Fishman Haygood, LLP and Bassford Remele.
President of the Minneapolis chapter of the NAACP and award-winning law professor at the University of St. Thomas, Ms. Levy-Pounds has long been a leading voice speaking out against inequalities faced by communities of color in the Twin Cities, including the disparities in public schools serving large numbers of students of color. Her support for this lawsuit as co-counsel reinforces its standing as the only recourse for families who are left feeling powerless with no means to challenge the continued employment of ineffective teachers.
“I am proud to join the legal team representing the plaintiffs of Forslund v. Minnesota because parents are the best advocates to stand up against a public education system that is failing Minnesota children, especially our children of color,” said Nekima Levy-Pounds. “Too often, the voices of those most harmed by the status quo are left without a seat at the table, but this time we will be heard. I am fighting on behalf of these four families, and all Minnesota families, because our public schools are not providing equal opportunities for educational success. We are calling on the courts to ensure that every Minnesota child is granted their right to equal protection under the law.”
Minnesota public schools have one of the largest educational disparities in the country, with low-income students and students of color falling far behind their white and more affluent peers. Yet Minnesota state statutes enable persistently ineffective teachers to remain in the classroom, denying students their constitutionally-protected right to a uniform and thorough education. Forslund v. Minnesota is grounded in a body of research showing that the key determinant of a child’s educational advancement is teacher quality and effectiveness. The state’s current teacher tenure, dismissal, and “Last in, First Out” seniority-based layoff laws harm students by preserving the state’s debilitating achievement gap.
“We’re honored to welcome Nekima Levy-Pounds to the legal team representing the plaintiff families in Forslund v. Minnesota,” said Ralia Polechronis, Executive Director of Partnership for Educational Justice. “As an award-winning professor, Nekima sees firsthand the positive impact a great teacher can have on her students. And as a civil rights attorney, she knows systemic injustices too often deny opportunities for success. We’re proud that the plaintiff families have Nekima by their side in the fight for a high-quality education for all Minnesota students.”
“Nekima Levy-Pounds has always had our community’s best interests at heart,” said Latasha Gandy, Executive Director of Students for Education Reform–Minnesota. “Her presence makes clear that this action is about civil rights and justice for children of color and low-income children. We’re proud Nekima is joining us and standing with parents who have taken on Minnesota’s education system for leaving so many children behind.”
About Nekima Levy-Pounds
Nekima Levy-Pounds is an award-winning professor of law at the University of St. Thomas Law School, a civil rights attorney, and a nationally recognized expert on a range of civil rights and social justice issues at the intersections of race, public policy, economic justice, public education, juvenile justice, and the criminal justice system. She was elected President of the Minneapolis chapter of the NAACP in May 2015.
In her role at the University of St. Thomas Law School, she serves as the founding director of the Community Justice Project, an award-winning civil rights legal clinic, which focuses on issues of race, poverty, and social justice through direct advocacy, research, and writing at the University of St. Thomas. She is also co-founder and board chair of Brotherhood, Inc., a nonprofit organization geared towards young African American men ages 16-24, who have been involved in the criminal justice system or gangs or who are at risk of such involvement.
Ms. Levy-Pounds also serves as the chair of the Minnesota State Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights and is the co-chair of Everybody In, a regional collaboration of over 40 stakeholders across different sectors working to close the racial unemployment gaps in the region by 2020. Ms. Levy-Pounds is active in the local community, serving on the boards of the Minneapolis Foundation, Catholic Charities, the African American Museum, and Growth & Justice.
Key Points in Forslund v. Minnesota
Forslund v. Minnesota asserts that the challenged statutes prevent school leaders from meaningfully considering student outcomes when making decisions regarding teacher employment and dismissals. As a result, Minnesota’s schools are retaining ineffective teachers who are preventing students from achieving an equal and high quality education. There are three basic problems:
- Minnesota’s teacher tenure provisions require administrators to determine permanent employment for teachers after only three years. This insufficient amount of time creates a process that is more of a formality, rather than an assessment of a teacher’s potential for long-term effectiveness. As a result, students, parents, and school leaders are left with no effective methods by which to challenge the employment of an ineffective teacher.
- Dismissal policies in Minnesota school districts make it nearly impossible to efficiently remove an ineffective teacher from the classroom, even after these teachers have long demonstrated to be ineffective. With nowhere to turn, school districts across the state have resorted to expensive negotiated “buyouts” to remove ineffective teachers from the classroom. In the absence of the current dismissal laws, Minnesota teachers would retain the due process rights available to all public employees, which include the right to notice of ineffective classroom performance, the right to challenge the evidence of ineffective performance, and the right for the teacher to tell her or his side of the story.
- The “last in, first out” mandate forces administrators to layoff teachers based on seniority rather than quality. This process completely disregards a teacher’s performance in the classroom and denies students access to a quality education by laying off effective teachers and keeping ineffective teachers in the classroom.
A full copy of the plaintiffs’ complaint is available here.
About Partnership for Educational Justice and Students for Educational Reform – Minnesota
Partnership for Educational Justice (PEJ)
PEJ is a nonprofit organization pursuing impact litigation that empowers families and communities to advocate for great public schools through the courts. In 2014, PEJ began working with families across New York to launch and support Wright v. New York, challenging teacher employment statutes that allow ineffective and harmful teachers to remain in the classroom. The Wright v. New York plaintiffs have won two separate motions to dismiss the case and are currently fighting the defendants’ appeals of these decisions.
PEJ is committed to ensuring that every child has equal access to a quality education and looks to offer families a pathway to educational justice through the courts, especially when legislative efforts have failed to do so. In Minnesota, as in New York, PEJ has connected families with pro bono legal representation and is providing ongoing legal support while elevating parent voices through supported outreach and media relations.
Students for Education Reform – Minnesota (SFER-Minn)
SFER-Minn organizes students and families to fight for educational justice in their communities. Their members identify issues that are driving inequities in the education they receive, share their stories, and push for lasting policy change on campus, in the community, at the Capitol, and – when necessary, in the courts – to ensure every child in Minnesota receives an equitable education. Other current SFER-Minn efforts include addressing Minnesota’s broken remedial education system, promoting statewide standards and oversight for how police work in schools, and monitoring local school board performance.
Contact:
Partnership for Educational Justice: Melody Meyer, melody@edjustice.org
Students for Education Reform-Minnesota: Kate Sattler, kate@makingwavescommunications.com
###
Forslund v. Minnesota Legal Documents
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- …
- 64
- Next Page »