Partnership for Educational Justice

  • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • Our History
    • Contact Us
  • Our Projects
    • New York Lawsuit
    • Minnesota Lawsuit
    • New Jersey Lawsuit
    • Permanent Employment
    • Other Initiatives
  • Resources
    • Research
    • FAQ
    • Wright v. New York Legal Filings
    • Forslund v. Minnesota Legal Filings
    • HG v. Harrington Legal Filings
    • DACA Legal Filings
    • Partnerships
  • Press Releases and Blog
    • Press Releases
    • Blog
  • Action
    • Donate
    • Share your Story
    • Sign up for our Email List
    • Follow Us on Social Media
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

PARTNERSHIP FOR EDUCATIONAL JUSTICE FIGHTING FOR DREAMERS

April 13, 2018

For Immediate Release:

April 13, 2018

PARTNERSHIP FOR EDUCATIONAL JUSTICE FIGHTING FOR DREAMERS

New York, NY – Partnership for Educational Justice (PEJ) this week submitted an amicus brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in support of the plaintiffs in the DACA lawsuits New York v. Trump and Vidal v. Nielsen. The filing is part of PEJ’s ongoing commitment to the students impacted by President Trump’s rescission of the DACA program.

PEJ has partnered with four other groups in the 50CAN network – including DelawareCAN: The Delaware Campaign for Achievement Now; HawaiiKidsCAN; NewMexicoKidsCAN; and Virginia Excels – to submit a series of briefs detailing the irreparable educational harms that will be experienced by students.

This week’s brief includes new research from a February 2018 study that found “that the implementation of DACA significantly improved attendance and graduation rates among Hispanic high school students, with the gap in high school completion between undocumented Hispanic young people and their citizen peers shrinking by 40 percent. Moreover, DACA led to a 22 percent increase in college attendance rates among Hispanic high school graduates.”[1]

“Current research clearly shows the benefits that DACA has had in improving education for children in need. These children’s futures are depending on the courts to protect their rights, and ultimately, on Congress to implement a permanent solution,” said Alissa Bernstein, Executive Director of Partnership for Educational Justice (PEJ).

PEJ’s full amicus brief can be found here. The law firm Cooley LLP provided pro bono representation for this amicus brief filing.

Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) is a policy created by President Barack Obama to help protect certain undocumented young people who came to the United States as children. After the Trump Administration announced that it would be phasing out the program, lawsuits were filed in federal courts in California and New York to stop the rescission from taking effect. If successful, the lawsuits will preserve the rights of the approximately 800,000 DACA grantees across the county who are covered by the program, and have been able to live, study and work in the United States without fear of arrest or deportation.

About Partnership for Educational Justice (PEJ)
PEJ pursues educational equity through legal action to improve the quality of public schools. PEJ utilizes a variety of legal actions to achieve its mission, including pursuing impact litigation, amicus brief filings, Freedom of Information Act requests, and other law-related avenues that seek to achieve meaningful reforms of education laws or policies that fail to prioritize students’ rights. PEJ is an affiliate of the national education nonprofit 50CAN: 50 State Campaign for Achievement Now, which advocates at the local level for a high-quality education for all kids, regardless of their address.

###

Contact:

Maggie McKeon, 315.730.5101, Maggie@kpa.nyc

[1] Elira Kuka, Na’ama Shenhav, & Kevin Shih, Do Human Capital Decisions Respond to the Returns to Education? Evidence from DACA, National Bureau of Economic Research, 17 (Feb. 2018)

Filed Under: Press Releases

STATEMENT ON APPEALS COURT DECISION ALLOWING WRIGHT v. NY TO MOVE FORWARD

March 28, 2018

For Immediate Release:

March 28, 2018

STATEMENT ON APPEALS COURT DECISION ALLOWING WRIGHT v. NY TO MOVE FORWARD

New York, NY – The Appellate Division, 2nd Department of the New York State Supreme Court delivered a key victory to the plaintiffs in Wright v. New York, affirming the denial of a motion to dismiss the case. The plaintiff families had also won the two motions to dismiss that were brought by the defendants in the lower court.

Alissa Bernstein, Executive Director of Partnership for Educational Justice (PEJ), said, “Today’s decision from the New York appeals court is an incredible victory for students’ rights. While the defendants have repeatedly tried to delay and dispose of this case, today’s decision affirms the fact that the brave parents and children who brought this suit deserve their day in court. The fight for educational justice will continue so that we can give our students the education they are guaranteed under the state constitution.”

Jay Lefkowitz, Kirkland & Ellis Senior Partner and lead plaintiffs’ counsel for Wright v. New York, said, “We are pleased that the Second Department has decided to allow this lawsuit to proceed and has once again rejected the effort by the State, the City, and the teachers’ unions to stop this lawsuit. New York’s constitution guarantees all children in the state a sound basic education, and the current teacher employment statutes are simply failing our children by keeping ineffective teachers in our public schools. This decision will finally allow us to get the evidence from the State that will vindicate the rights of parents and children across the state.”

The Wright v. New York case was first filed in 2014, when nine families from across the state brought suit against the State of New York and others, claiming that teacher tenure, dismissal, and quality-blind layoff laws deprive New York children of their right to a sound basic education as guaranteed under the New York State Constitution.

About Partnership for Educational Justice (PEJ)
PEJ pursues educational equity through legal action to improve the quality of public schools. PEJ utilizes a variety of legal actions to achieve its mission, including pursuing impact litigation, amicus brief filings, Freedom of Information Act requests, and other law-related avenues that seek to achieve meaningful reforms of education laws or policies that fail to prioritize students’ rights. PEJ is an affiliate of the national education nonprofit 50CAN: 50-State Campaign for Achievement Now, which advocates at the local level for a high-quality education for all kids, regardless of their address.

###

Contact:

Maggie McKeon

315.730.5101

Maggie@kpa.nyc

Filed Under: Press Releases

PARTNERSHIP FOR EDUCATIONAL JUSTICE CONTINUES FIGHT FOR DREAMERS

March 21, 2018

For Immediate Release:

March 21, 2018

PARTNERSHIP FOR EDUCATIONAL JUSTICE CONTINUES FIGHT FOR DREAMERS

New York, NY – Partnership for Educational Justice (PEJ) yesterday submitted an amicus brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in support of the plaintiffs in the DACA lawsuit Regents of the University of California v. United States Department of Homeland Security. The filing is part of PEJ’s ongoing support for the plaintiffs that filed federal lawsuits to block President Trump’s rescission of the DACA program.

PEJ has partnered with four other groups in the 50CAN network – including DelawareCAN: The Delaware Campaign for Achievement Now; HawaiiKidsCAN; NewMexicoKidsCAN; and Virginia Excels – to submit a brief detailing the irreparable educational harms that will be experienced by students. This brief presents unique information and perspective to the court beyond what has been provided by the lawyers for the parties, providing critical perspective for the court’s understanding of what is at stake for students.

“DACA is an immigration policy, but in the world of advocacy and reform, it is also an education policy. The stories of Dreamers and continued research from scholars about DACA’s impact on academic achievement make it clear that the results of the latest government showdown on the issue have far-reaching consequences,” said Alissa Bernstein, Executive Director of Partnership for Educational Justice (PEJ). “Our children’s educational futures should not be used as a political bargaining chip. We can only hope that our courts will provide the checks and balances that judicial review was designed to guarantee for the benefit of every student whose future depends on it.”

PEJ’s full amicus brief can be found here. The law firm Cooley LLP provided pro bono representation for this amicus brief filing.

Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) is a policy created by President Barack Obama to help protect certain undocumented young people who came to the United States as children. After the Trump Administration announced that it would be phasing out the program, lawsuits were filed in federal courts in California and New York to stop the rescission from taking effect. If successful, the lawsuits will preserve the rights of the approximately 800,000 DACA grantees across the county who are covered by the program, and have been able to live, study and work in the United States without fear of arrest or deportation.

About Partnership for Educational Justice (PEJ)
PEJ pursues educational equity through legal action to improve the quality of public schools. PEJ utilizes a variety of legal actions to achieve its mission, including pursuing impact litigation, amicus brief filings, Freedom of Information Act requests, and other law-related avenues that seek to achieve meaningful reforms of education laws or policies that fail to prioritize students’ rights. PEJ is an affiliate of the national education nonprofit 50CAN: 50 State Campaign for Achievement Now, which advocates at the local level for a high-quality education for all kids, regardless of their address.

###

Contact:

Maggie McKeon, 315.730.5101, Maggie@kpa.nyc

Filed Under: Press Releases

PRESS RELEASE: PEJ Report Details How Outdated Tenure Laws Put Children at Risk

January 22, 2018

For Immediate Release:

January 22, 2018

PEJ REPORT DETAILS HOW OUTDATED TENURE LAWS PUT CHILDREN AT RISK

New York, NY – A stunning analysis of teacher disciplinary proceedings reveals how existing tenure laws make it nearly impossible to fire tenured teachers in New York even after they are found guilty of fireable offenses. A review of 212 settlement agreements and 773 tenure misconduct hearing opinions over a span of six years details how ineffective and harmful teachers are able to game the system to keep their jobs. The analysis confirms that tenured teachers in New York State have essentially landed a “job for life,” no matter how apathetic or abusive they become.

In one instance, the New York City Department of Education (NYC DOE) attempted to fire a tenured teacher for sexual misconduct, among other serious charges. Even though an arbitrator substantiated the charges and found that the teacher showed no remorse, he was given only a 45-day suspension, not required to attend any rehabilitative training, and was back on the DOE payroll within a year, earning $81,230.

“While the tenure system was originally designed to protect high-quality teachers, New York’s outdated tenure laws also allow harmful and ineffective teachers to slip through the cracks and make their way back into classrooms, putting children at risk,” said Alissa Bernstein, Executive Director of Partnership for Educational Justice (PEJ). “As alarming as this report is, it’s still just the tip of the iceberg. We won’t have full transparency on these issues until Wright v. NY is allowed to move forward and we pull back the curtain once and for all. Shining a bright light on the broken tenure system will finally drive action towards delivering the quality education all children deserve.”

The full report is available at Cracks in the System: How New York’s Tenure Laws are Protecting the Jobs of Ineffective Teachers at the Expense of Students.

Key Findings include:

  • Essentially all educators who complete a termination hearing are found guilty of at least one fireable offense.
  • Sixty percent of educators found guilty of a fireable offense after a hearing receive a penalty other than termination.
  • On average, it takes more than a year to resolve tenured teacher misconduct charges through a dismissal hearing.
  • For at least two decades, the tenured teacher dismissal hearing process has returned most teachers who have committed a fireable offense back to public schools.
  • Publicly accessible information reported in settlement agreements does not provide full transparency on the issues at hand.

“When teachers who committed fireable offenses are allowed to remain in the classroom, it is clear that the system is working against our children. I am sick and tired of watching my kids fall further and further behind. If teachers aren’t doing the job, then they shouldn’t have a job,” said Arlene Rosado, public school parent from the Bronx.

“The hardest part of my day is dropping my daughter off at school because I don’t feel she is safe while she is there. It’s a struggle to explain to my 5-year old how she needs to avoid a certain man at her school. A system that places an adult’s job security over the safety of children is in need of fundamental and immediate reform,” said Jane Obadiu, a public school parent from Queens.

About Partnership for Educational Justice (PEJ)

PEJ pursues educational equity through legal action that empowers families and communities to improve the quality of public schools. PEJ utilizes a variety of legal actions to achieve its mission, including pursuing impact litigation, amicus brief filings, Freedom of Information Act requests, and other law-related avenues that seek to achieve meaningful reforms of education laws or policies that fail to prioritize students’ rights. PEJ is an affiliate of the national education nonprofit 50CAN: 50 State Campaign for Achievement Now, which advocates at the local level for a high-quality education for all kids, regardless of their address.

###

Contact:

Peter Kauffmann

peter@kpa.nyc

Filed Under: Press Releases

PRESS RELEASE: Partnership For Educational Justice Fights For Dreamers

December 21, 2017

For Immediate Release:

December 21, 2017

PARTNERSHIP FOR EDUCATIONAL JUSTICE FIGHTS FOR DREAMERS

 New York, NY – Partnership for Educational Justice (PEJ) today submitted an amicus brief in support of the Plaintiffs that filed lawsuits in Brooklyn, New York federal court fighting against President Trump’s rescission of the DACA program. PEJ partnered with four other groups in the 50CAN network – including DelawareCAN: The Delaware Campaign for Achievement Now; HawaiiKidsCAN; NewMexicoKidsCAN; and Virginia Excels – to submit a brief detailing the irreparable educational harms that will be experienced by students. This brief presents unique information and perspective to the court beyond what has been provided by the lawyers for the parties, providing critical perspective for the court’s understanding of what is at stake for students. The law firm Cooley LLP provided pro bono representation for this amicus brief filing.

DACA has allowed undocumented young people to take part in many rites of passage, such as obtaining a driver’s license, opening a bank account, working legally and securing an internship, and receiving financial aid – which all position students to pursue long term educational and career goals.  Critically, DACA has also eliminated the daily fear of arrest and deportation among DACA grantees and their family members, which has allowed students to enjoy better mental health, allowing them to focus on their studies rather than their worries and anxiety.  If DACA is rescinded, these students will be stripped of the resources that have enabled them to succeed academically in recent years.

“When DACA was implemented in 2012, the program rapidly expanded undocumented students’ future opportunities, incentivizing them to work harder, complete high school, and gain admission to colleges and universities. Dreamers are hard-working, driven young people who deserve the opportunity to realize the American dream. The heartless decision to punish them is misguided and will only make our nation weaker. As an organization founded to fight for educational justice, we could not sit idly by while hundreds of thousands of students were denied the opportunity of an education, which is a right that must be made available to all students on equal terms,” said Alissa Bernstein, Executive Director of Partnership for Educational Justice (PEJ).

PEJ’s full amicus brief can be found here.

Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) is a policy created by President Barack Obama to help protect certain undocumented young people who came to the United States as children. After the Trump Administration announced that it would be phasing out the program, a group of seventeen state attorneys general filed a lawsuit in Brooklyn, New York federal court to stop the rescission from taking effect. If successful, the lawsuit will preserve the rights of the approximately 800,000 DACA grantees across the county who are covered by the program, and have been able to live, study and work in the United States without fear of arrest or deportation.

To immediately stop the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA, on December 15, 2017 the Plaintiff States filed a request for the court to issue a preliminary injunction, which asks the judge to enter an order prohibiting the rescission of DACA from going into effect even before the lawsuit reaches a final resolution. In support of their request for a preliminary injunction, various groups are filing amicus briefs with the court. The court is scheduled to hear oral argument on this request from both sides on January 18, 2018 at the Brooklyn, New York federal courthouse.

About Partnership for Educational Justice (PEJ)
PEJ pursues educational equity through legal action that empowers families and communities to improve the quality of public schools. PEJ utilizes a variety of legal actions to achieve its mission, including pursuing impact litigation, amicus brief filings, Freedom of Information Act requests, and other law-related avenues that seek to achieve meaningful reforms of education laws or policies that fail to prioritize students’ rights. PEJ is an affiliate of the national education nonprofit 50CAN: 50 State Campaign for Achievement Now, which advocates at the local level for a high-quality education for all kids, regardless of their address.

###

Contact:

Maggie McKeon, 315.730.5101, Maggie@kpa.nyc

Filed Under: Press Releases

PRESS RELEASE: New York Parents Urge Court To Advance Case For Educational Justice

November 30, 2017

For Immediate Release:

November 30, 2017

NEW YORK PARENTS URGE COURT TO ADVANCE CASE FOR EDUCATIONAL JUSTICE

Brooklyn, NY – The Wright v. New York plaintiff families were back in court today to demand that their case for educational justice be allowed to move forward. The Wright plaintiffs are nine parents seeking to enforce New York’s constitutional guarantee of a sound basic education for their children and for all of New York’s schoolchildren. In the trial court, the families won two previous motions to dismiss filed by the defendants and today appeared before New York’s intermediate appellate court to defend their prior victories.

“Antiquated laws and entrenched special interests have created a broken status quo that violates New York’s constitutional guarantee of a sound basic education for all children. The status quo must change when it does not prioritize students’ rights. We are proud to stand with these brave families who are demanding better for their children and students across New York,” said Alissa Bernstein, Executive Director of Partnership for Educational Justice (PEJ).

In oral arguments presented in the Appellate Division, 2nd Department of the New York State Supreme Court, the plaintiffs argued that the existing school system is failing their children, and that the outsized job protections for chronically ineffective teachers across New York must be struck down.

“As public school parents, we deserve to have our day in court. The forces of the status quo can keep playing games with stall tactics and delays, but we won’t let them run out the clock on our kids. We won’t back down until we get educational justice for our children,” said Carla Williams, a mother from Rochester and plaintiff in Wright v. New York.

“The broken education system was built to protect the jobs of ineffective teachers, not educate children. Just look at New York City, where the Department of Education is forcing hundreds of ineffective teachers back into classrooms against the will of school principals. It’s time for the court to step in to protect the rights of our children,” said Nina Doster, a mother from Queens and plaintiff in Wright v. New York.

The Wright v. New York plaintiffs are fighting for their case to move forward just as New York City implements a plan to return to forced placement, a policy that was eliminated in 2005. Research shows that teacher quality is the most influential in-school factor when it comes to student learning. It also shows that student achievement improves when principals are allowed to hire school staff according to quality and fit. Despite this overwhelming evidence, several hundred teachers from the Absent Teacher Reserve (ATR) are being placed into classrooms against the will of school principals. The ATR pool is largely made up of ineffective teachers who have been unable to find teaching positions even though there are vacancies. Although the NYC DOE refuses to share details of its plan, ATR teachers will most likely end up in schools with high numbers of teacher vacancies, located mainly in low-income neighborhoods.

About Partnership for Educational Justice (PEJ)
An affiliate of the national education nonprofit 50CAN, PEJ pursues educational equity through legal action that empowers families and communities to improve the quality of public schools. PEJ is currently working with parents and students in New York, Minnesota, and New Jersey in support of legal challenges to unjust teacher employment statutes in those states. In all three states, PEJ has connected families with pro bono legal representation and is providing parents with ongoing legal, advocacy, and communications support.

###

Contact:

Maggie McKeon, 315.730.5101, Maggie@kpa.nyc

Filed Under: Press Releases

STATEMENT from PEJ on Minnesota Supreme Court Granting Plaintiffs’ Petition for Review in Forslund v. Minnesota

November 14, 2017

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

November 14, 2017

Partnership for Educational Justice: Alissa Bernstein, alissa@edjustice.org or 646.874.3602

Statement from Partnership for Educational Justice on the Granting of Plaintiffs’ Petition for Review in Forslund v. Minnesota by the Minnesota Supreme Court

In response to an appeal from Minnesota parents, the Minnesota Supreme Court today agreed to hear arguments in Forslund v. Minnesota. First filed in April 2016, the lawsuit challenges state laws that protect the jobs of chronically ineffective teachers at the expense of Minnesota students’ right to a quality education.

Partnership for Educational Justice Executive Director Alissa Bernstein released the following statement:

“The issues at hand in Forslund v. Minnesota are important for every public school family in Minnesota, and every Minnesotan who cares about a quality education for kids. When students’ rights are violated, we count on the courts to protect our children. We are gratified that the Minnesota Supreme Court recognizes the importance of this case and is engaging in the issues raised by the Forslund plaintiffs.”

– Alissa Bernstein, Executive Director, Partnership for Educational Justice

Filed Under: Press Releases

PRESS RELEASE: Parents Ask Minnesota Supreme Court To Hear Lawsuit Challenging Excessive Teacher Job Protections

October 4, 2017

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 4, 2017
Contact: Melody Meyer, (917) 428-6692
Click here to read today’s petition to the Minnesota Supreme Court

St. Paul, MN—A group of mothers from across Minnesota today petitioned the state supreme court to hear Forslund v. Minnesota, which challenges state education laws that provide outsized job security to chronically ineffective teachers. The State defendants have 20 days to submit a response and once fully briefed, the Minnesota Supreme Court will issue a determination as to whether they will hear the case. At issue is whether the Minnesota courts will provide judicial review on issues related to the quality of public education, which is protected as a fundamental right in the state.

A full copy of the parents’ petition to the Minnesota Supreme Court, along with all other legal filings related to the case, is available for download here.

###

About Partnership for Educational Justice (PEJ)
An affiliate of the national education nonprofit 50CAN, PEJ pursues impact litigation that empowers families and communities to advocate for great public schools through the courts. PEJ is currently working with parents and students in Minnesota, New York, and New Jersey in support of legal challenges to unjust teacher employment statutes in those states. In all three states, PEJ has connected families with pro bono legal representation and is providing parents with ongoing legal, advocacy, and communications support.

About Students for Education Reform Minnesota (SFER-Minn)
SFER-Minn organizes students and families to fight for educational justice in their communities. Their members identify issues that are driving inequities in the education they receive, share their stories, and push for lasting policy change on campus, in the community, at the Capitol, and – when necessary, in the courts – to ensure every child in Minnesota receives an equitable education. Other current SFER-Minn efforts include addressing Minnesota’s broken remedial education system, promoting statewide standards and oversight for how police work in schools, and monitoring local school board performance.

Filed Under: Press Releases

PRESS RELEASE: Newark Parents Request Appeal of Dismissal of LIFO Lawsuit

May 25, 2017

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
May 25, 2017
Contact: Melody Meyer, melody@edjustice.org or 646.770.7061

Newark Parents Request Appeal of Dismissal of LIFO Lawsuit
 
The parents’ filing to the appellate division court is attached to this email and available online here
Trenton, NJ—A group of Newark parents yesterday filed a formal request to appeal a trial court judge’s dismissal earlier this month of their lawsuit challenging the state’s “last in, first out” teacher layoff law. Filed last November, the parents’ lawsuit asserts that the LIFO statute violates students’ right to an education by unjustly requiring school districts to retain ineffective teachers while cutting other areas of education spending or laying off more effective teachers when faced with funding deficits.
Defendants from Newark Public Schools (NPS) and the State of New Jersey did not move to dismiss the case. Instead, NPS admitted nearly every allegation made about the impact of New Jersey’s LIFO law on children within NPS. The motions to dismiss the case granted earlier this month were raised by intervening defendants from local and national teachers unions, including the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) the New Jersey Education Association (NJEA), and the Newark Teachers Union (NTU).If the parents’ request for appeal is granted, arguments from the Newark families and the teachers unions will be reviewed by a panel of four judges from the Appellate Division of New Jersey Superior Court.

“Public schools are here to educate our children, first and foremost,” said Wendy Soto, plaintiff and mother of two Newark Public School students. “Everyone knows that many New Jersey school districts are in a serious funding crisis. Politicians have not protected our children’s right to a quality public education, and parents like me have nowhere to turn. The quality-blind LIFO law makes a difficult situation even worse for students in struggling schools. Enough is enough. It’s time to end this ridiculous law.”

“New Jersey’s LIFO law forces school districts like Newark to retain ineffective teachers and, in fact, put them back in the classroom while cutting spending to other critical areas of public education. Students are constitutionally entitled to more than this,” said Kathleen Reilly, attorney with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, one of the firms representing the Newark parents pro bono. “These decisions – made to evade application of the LIFO law – harm children. The negative impact of LIFO is pervasive today in Newark public schools and these families deserve to have their case heard in court.”

Since at least 2012, NPS has avoided laying off effective teachers by paying millions of dollars per year to cover the salaries of ineffective – but more senior – teachers even when no school would agree to their placement in the school. This expensive work-around, which is costing the district $10 million dollars in 2016-17, diverts valuable resources from educational programming and other critical components of an adequate public education. Because NPS employs more than half of the state’s ineffective teachers, it also puts Newark students at significant risk of being assigned to an ineffective teacher.

After it was announced that New Jersey State education funding would remain essentially flat for the 2017-18 school year, NPS acknowledged a looming $30 million deficit because of rising costs. Facing similar budget gaps over the past three years, NPS administrators restricted hiring practices, forcing teachers previously without placement into schools without mutual consent from the teacher and the principal. Research shows that teacher quality is the most influential in-school factor when it comes to student learning. It also shows that student achievement improves when principals are allowed to hire school staff according to quality and fit, rather than restricted by seniority.

To learn more about the parent-led lawsuit to end LIFO in New Jersey, please go to edjustice.org/nj. All legal filings related to the lawsuit are available online here.

About Partnership for Educational Justice (PEJ)
Founded in 2014, Partnership for Educational Justice is a nonprofit organization pursuing impact litigation that empowers families and communities to advocate for great public schools through the courts. In addition to supporting teacher layoff litigation in New Jersey, PEJ is currently working with parents and students in New York and Minnesota in support of legal challenges to unjust teacher employment statutes in those states.

###

Filed Under: Press Releases

PRESS RELEASE: Newark Parents Oppose Teachers Unions’ Motions to Dismiss LIFO Lawsuit

March 30, 2017

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 30, 2017
Contact: Melody Meyer, melody@edjustice.org or 646.770.7061

Newark Parents Oppose Teachers Unions’ Motions to Dismiss LIFO Lawsuit
Oral arguments before a Mercer County Superior Court judge are scheduled for May 3

Trenton, New Jersey — Six Newark parents yesterday opposed motions to dismiss HG v. Harrington, the lawsuit they filed last November challenging the constitutionality of New Jersey’s quality-blind “last in, first out” (LIFO) teacher layoff law. The motions to dismiss the case were filed earlier this month by local and national teachers unions, who intervened as defendants in the case last December. Oral arguments on the motions to dismiss are scheduled for 2pm on May 3 before the Mercer County Superior Court. Defendants from Newark Public Schools and the New Jersey Department of Education did not move to dismiss the case.

“The teachers unions clearly are not looking out for students’ best interests,” said Kathleen Reilly, attorney with Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, one of the law firms representing the Newark parents pro bono. “With education budget deficits in the tens of millions of dollars, the court urgently needs to hear these parents’ concerns about laws that require schools to keep ineffective teachers while letting effective ones go. If students’ educational rights are valued, these laws cannot stand.”

In their answer to the lawsuit, defendants from the Newark Public Schools overwhelmingly conceded that the LIFO law harms students, acknowledging that enforcement of LIFO in Newark will remove quality teachers, which leads to lower test scores, lower high school graduation rates, lower college attendance rates, and sharply reduced lifetime earnings. They also admit that the current practice of keeping ineffective teachers on the district payroll, including those in a pool of “educators without placement sites” (EWPS) is harmful and unsustainable, and that the EWPS pool would be wholly unnecessary were it not for LIFO.

To learn more about the parent-led lawsuit to end LIFO in New Jersey, please go to edjustice.org/nj. All legal filings related to HG v. Harrington are available online here.

Filed Under: Press Releases

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 5
  • Next Page »
  • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • Our History
    • Contact Us
  • Our Projects
    • New York Lawsuit
    • Minnesota Lawsuit
    • New Jersey Lawsuit
    • Permanent Employment
    • Other Initiatives
  • Resources
    • Research
    • FAQ
    • Wright v. New York Legal Filings
    • Forslund v. Minnesota Legal Filings
    • HG v. Harrington Legal Filings
    • DACA Legal Filings
    • Partnerships
  • Press Releases and Blog
    • Press Releases
    • Blog
  • Action
    • Donate
    • Share your Story
    • Sign up for our Email List
    • Follow Us on Social Media
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright

© 2014 Partnership for Educational Justice

Disclaimer

Partnership for Educational Justice is recognized by the Internal Revenue Service as an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Privacy Policy

Terms & Conditions